Programming Ruby 3.2 (5th Edition): B2.0 page 406, superfluous have?

@noelrappin

Already in the previous edition !

page 406, paragraph after the code for metaprogramming/open_struct_flaw.rb, line 3 :

don’t have yet have an attribute called dup). We could fix this so that it at least reports an
        -----> ^^^^

The second have seems superfluous.

Probably this should be “we don’t yet have” or “we don’t have an attribute called dup yet”, which is probably even better.