# The Zig project's rationale for their firm anti-AI contribution policy

**URL:** <https://forum.devtalk.com/t/the-zig-projects-rationale-for-their-firm-anti-ai-contribution-policy/243454>\
**Category:** AI In The News\
**Tags:** via-news-bot, project, zig\
**Created:** [2 May 2026 01:09 UTC](https://forum.devtalk.com/t/the-zig-projects-rationale-for-their-firm-anti-ai-contribution-policy/243454 "2026-05-02T01:09:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AntonRich](https://forum.devtalk.com/user_avatar/forum.devtalk.com/antonrich/32/3165_2.png) [@AntonRich](https://forum.devtalk.com/u/AntonRich)\
**Post date:** [7 May 2026 13:28 UTC](https://forum.devtalk.com/t/the-zig-projects-rationale-for-their-firm-anti-ai-contribution-policy/243454/3 "2026-05-07T13:28:27Z")

</div>

> This makes a lot of sense to me. It relates to an idea I’ve seen circulating elsewhere: if a PR was mostly written by an LLM, why should a project maintainer spend time reviewing and discussing that PR as opposed to firing up their own LLM to solve the same problem?

It’s a really good way to put it.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.devtalk.com/t/the-zig-projects-rationale-for-their-firm-anti-ai-contribution-policy/243454)._