# The state of C++ package management: The big three

**URL:** <https://forum.devtalk.com/t/the-state-of-c-package-management-the-big-three/164923>\
**Category:** In The News\
**Tags:** c-plus-plus, in-the-news\
**Created:** [5 August 2024 01:27 UTC](https://forum.devtalk.com/t/the-state-of-c-package-management-the-big-three/164923 "2024-08-05T01:27:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CommunityNews](https://forum.devtalk.com/user_avatar/forum.devtalk.com/communitynews/32/1113_2.png) [@CommunityNews](https://forum.devtalk.com/u/CommunityNews)\
**Post date:** [5 August 2024 01:27 UTC](https://forum.devtalk.com/t/the-state-of-c-package-management-the-big-three/164923/1 "2024-08-05T01:27:55Z")

</div>

> #1 The state of C++ package management: The big three.  
> In this post I’m gonna do a short overview of package management and vendoring solutions for C++. This is a controversial topic. Still, there’s no official standardised package manager however, there’s a plethora of solutions (some more mature than others) which I think solve the problem well (at least as far as I’m concerned). I planned to publish the entire overview in a single post however, there’s a lot of material to cover and eventually I had to split it up into multiple parts.

Read in full here:

> **[\#1 The state of C++ package management: The big three](https://twdev.blog/2024/08/cpp_pkgmng1/)**
>
> In this post I’m gonna do a short overview of package management and vendoring solutions for C++. This is a controversial topic. Still, there’s no official standardised package manager however, there’s a plethora of solutions (some more mature than...

_This thread was posted by one of our members via one of our news source trackers._