Ten years without Elixir

Ten years without Elixir.
I never got into Elixir, largely because it looked like Ruby. I was a Rubyist for a good while, spent time and effort to learn where to park my commas, semicolons, and periods in Erlang, so I never felt that Elixir was something I wanted.

http://blog.cretaria.com/posts/ten-years-without-elixir.html

This thread was posted by one of our members via one of our news source trackers.

2 Likes

Corresponding tweet for this thread:

https://twitter.com/dev_talk/status/1349479733164208129

Share link for this tweet.


Related portal:

1 Like

I am not sure I understand the criticism on pipes.

2 Likes

Yeah… esp since pipes are one of the things people love about Elixir :smiley:

2 Likes

At first I did not like pipes as much, because it felt limited (only first argument) and I was fresh out of Clojure. Then I realized to appreciate the power of limitations. Data design in Elixir feels very natural since you have an intuitive understanding of what the first argument should be. I am fine with that, although I could create a pipe_second or pipe_third, I’d never do that because I prefer stability to extreme sports. I had struggle grokking the pipe (looks the same: |>) of F#, because it doesn’t pipe into first argument, but the final one, and for some time I couldn’t visualize function signatures in my head, but everything became clear after I embraced the curry-by-default mindset. It does not have macro that would be threading in, but they don’t need it, because f(a, b)(c) is f(a, b, c) and c |> f(a, b) is just rotating the (c).

But even then, Elixir’s is the best pipe for me.

(btw I am not saying Clojure is extreme sports, it has different philosophy and design mindset)

2 Likes